THE FAITH OF CULTIC EVOLUTIONISTS

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Fools say to themselves, “There is no God.” They sin and commit evil deeds; none of them does what is right. God looks down from heaven at the human race, to see if there is anyone who is wise and seeks God. Everyone rejects God; they are all morally corrupt. None of them does what is right, not even one! All those who behave wickedly do not understand – those who devour my people as if they were eating bread, and do not call out to God.
Psalm 53:1-4 NET

Here is a section from www.crev.info for your mind.

“When people cease to believe in God, they don’t believe in nothing; they believe in anything (G. K. Chesterton). This is “the most useful thing we’ve got to describe the origin of the universe,” they said. Why? Only because they have ruled out a Creator. The founders of science (who were Christians, for the most part) would be appalled at the recklessness of these theories. No evidence required; no possible way to test them; invented “notions” presented as evidence; everything becomes a prediction and nothing qualifies as a potentially falsifying observation. Don’t be deceived just because these guys are good at math. Even some idiot savants have that ability. We’ve come full circle from the Sumerian myths to modern cosmology, where consensus counts more than evidence, and you can make up a story and foist it on the populace, the crazier the better. In the beginning, God sure has a welcome sound about it right now.”

It’s Loony Toons in the 21st century. PBS or The “Science Channel” or an HD documentary narrated by none other than Oprah touting to give us the “facts” about our evolutionary origins in lies in the guise of scientific fact. It is a lie. Did you hear? Lie. Let’s spell it together: L - I - E. That spells LIE. Don’t believe it. Work so you are not allowing others to believe it, too. At least tell others the truth. I would exhort you to explore www.answersingenesis.org often. Answers are there about the truth of science and the truth of our origins from a biblical (as in truth of God) perspective. Pray, work, speak out, don’t be intimidated, persuade others. This is about our origins. What we believe there powerfully affects world views all over the world and expands a rejection of God’s supernatural role in the whole thing. Then with God rejected, sinful and wicked humankind takes over through pride that always leads to destruction.

So, we have our work cut out for us. Do not be ashamed or afraid of mere men, or women. Speak the truth in love, which means taking a stand for the truth with deep conviction and spiritual preparation along with answers you have studied and are ready to use, again, unashamedly for your God and Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ Himself.

BIG BANG BUSTED

Wednesday, March 03, 2010

When I look up at the heavens, which your fingers made, and see the moon and the stars, which you set in place, of what importance is the human race, that you should notice them? Of what importance is mankind, that you should pay attention to them, and make them a little less than the heavenly beings?
Psalm 8:3-5 NET

This blog is taken from an article by Spike Psarris, a Creation Astronomer.

A few months ago, NASA released the 'deepest' astronomical image ever taken. You can view it here.

As technology improves, we can photograph objects that are farther and farther away. This is the latest in a long-term series of "deepest ever" images released by NASA. Each time a new image has been released - including this one - it has not matched the expectations of those who believe in the Big Bang. Here's why:

According to Big Bang believers, this image contains objects that are 13 billion light-years away. Thus, we're looking at these objects as they were 13 billion years ago. That's just a few hundred million years after the Big Bang itself. (There are major problems and lots of unstated assumptions in this line of reasoning, but we'll ignore them for now.) However, according to the secular model, stars and galaxies could not form directly out of the Big Bang. They needed some time to form.

Before we had space telescopes, astronomers had calculated how long this time would be. But then we started taking deep-field photographs. And we started finding mature objects that weren't supposed to be there, according to the Big Bang hypothesis. Each time a new "deepest" photograph comes out, astronomers have had to adjust their models again. This image is no different. For example, in this article a secular astronomer says, "to our surprise, the results show that these galaxies at 700 million years after the Big Bang must have started forming stars hundreds of millions of years earlier, pushing back the time of the earliest star formation in the universe."

The photographs usually challenge the model in other ways, too. As you'll read in the article I just mentioned, astronomers are still scratching their heads over post-Big-Bang re-ionization. They're also wondering how such objects can seem so bright despite being so far away. This has implications for models of star formation, as New Scientist explained in this article.

Despite all these challenges, astronomers confidently use words like "primordial" and "building blocks" when describing these objects. This reflects their beliefs, not the actual data.

What do we really know from discoveries like this? That the farther out we look, we keep finding more and more to discover. We also see how flexible the Big Bang theory is. Atheists criticize creationists for having a model that can't be falsified, as scientific models must be. To some extent this is true, but it's a hollow accusation, because the Big Bang can't be falsified either.

Next year will mark the 80th birthday of the Big Bang theory (although it wasn't called that until much later). During those 80 years, its predictions have been contradicted again and again. But rather than abandon the model, its adherents have just slapped on layer after layer of bandages.

Thanks to Spike Psarris for this article. For more creation truths in astronomy, go to: www.creationastronomy.com